5/6/2023 0 Comments Folx health lawsuit![]() ![]() He noted, for instance, that some employers might have valid religious objections to hiring gay or trans workers. And he pointed to several major court rulings since the law's passage have read it expansively - for instance, to bar discrimination against women because they have children and to ban sexual harassment against both women and men.Īs Gorsuch said of Title VII, "the limits of the drafters' imagination supply no reason to ignore the law's demands."Īt the end of his 33-page opinion, however, Gorsuch invoked several potential caveats. But he said the words of the statute are clear. Gorsuch acknowledged that Congress in 1964 likely did not have the LGBTQ community in mind when it banned discrimination based on sex. "They followed the culture, not the law," he said. John Bursch, who represented the funeral home in the transgender firing case, agreed. It accused the majority of sailing under a "textualist flag," essentially pretending to remain true to the words of the statute but instead updating it "to better reflect the current values of society." Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, wrote the lead dissent. The Gorsuch opinion drew two dissents, one from the court's other Trump appointee, Brett Kavanaugh, so that Trump's two appointee were in a verbal version of what Yale Law Professor William Eskridge called "trench warfare." "If the employer fires the male employee for no reason other than the fact that he is attracted to men," but not the woman who is attracted to men, that is clearly a firing based on sex, he said. ![]() ![]() He gave the example of two employees attracted to men - one male, the other female. "It is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating. Gorsuch couched his opinion in terms of the text of the 1964 statute and its ban on discrimination because of sex. She died earlier this year, but her case lived on. So yeah, I think they're fantastic and if they're available in your state and you can afford it, I would highly recommend it.The third case was brought by Aimee Stephens, who had worked for six years as a male funeral director in Livonia, Mich., but was fired two weeks after she told her boss that she was transgender and would be coming to work as a woman. (Some people are saying that they're not seeing any results or that it's just not working for them, but it also sounds like they're still in the early stages.) I wasn't absolutely certain what to expect so I had a lot more patience and didn't think it would all happen within the first month. I know I'm only a year in so I'm nowhere near "complete" but everything that's supposed to happen within the first year has either happened or has begun to happen. In fact, I'm still going through one set of pills while the other set is waiting to be opened.Īs far as my actual transition goes, I've definitely been seeing results. I always get my pills on time, and there's never a problem with any shipping or delivery. (I've seen people mention how they never hear from them and it's impossible to contact them.) If I schedule a video call, (which I rarely do) I get the call and they answer all my questions in a professional and kind manner. This has always been the case, regardless of what the question is. When I send them a message for a question or anything, I get a response 1-3 days later. (I don't know how some people are paying up to $300 a month.) Now that I'm basically at one year, they've dropped the price down to $60 a month, as was the original agreement. I started off paying $120 a month for estradiol and spironolactone, and all the services they provide. As someone who has been with them for almost a year, I'd like to give my opinion. I've read a lot of bad things about Folx here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |